The perils of the partisan chase!

WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 2017

Jo Becker meets Toobin and Turley:
What actually happened at that now-famous Trump Tower meeting?

At this point, there's no way to know. Did anything happen at that meeting? At this point, we're slightly flummoxed by one of the people who was in the room.

Donald Trump Jr. was there in the room. So were Manafort and Kushner, rounding out the heavy-hitters three.

That said, the music publicist was also apparently present, listening to every word which was said. On that basis, this doesn't strike us as a case of top-flight international spy-craft.

What is the nature of Donald J. Trump's fealty to the Russkies? We'd like to see a careful probe of that question.

Unfortunately, a major chase is now on, with journalistic procedures perhaps breaking down. Actually, we told you that a chase was on several months back. With the events of the past few days, that chase has turned into a land rush.

In our view, Anderson Cooper has especially gone off the rails. We haven't yet dared to watch Maddow's program from last night, aside from a few glimmers of her instant overstatements.

Then too, there's the New York Times' Jo Becker. You may remember her as the lead author of the paper's 4400-word report about the scary uranium deal.

It may have been the most horrendous news report of the Trump-Clinton campaign. It was filled with journalistic abominations, it banged the drum, loud and strong, against the vile Candidate Clinton.

Becker's "scary uranium deal" report drove a claim about Candidate Clinton which was still getting mentioned on cable last night. Our liberal children gave it a complete pass when it appeared, except for Chris Hayes, who called the report a "bombshell."

Becker's report was an abomination. Now, she seems to be the Times' lead reporter in the Trump Junior chase.

Atop this morning's page one, Becker's report started as shown below. By paragraph 3, we were thinking of her hideous work on the scary uranium deal:
BECKER (7/12/17): The June 3, 2016, email sent to Donald Trump Jr. could hardly have been more explicit: One of his father’s former Russian business partners had been contacted by a senior Russian government official and was offering to provide the Trump campaign with dirt on Hillary Clinton.

The documents “would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father,” read the email, written by a trusted intermediary, who added, “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

If the future president’s eldest son was surprised or disturbed by the provenance of the promised material—or the notion that it was part of a continuing effort by the Russian government to aid his father’s campaign—he gave no indication.

He replied within minutes: “If it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer.”
We'll be honest. We're among the few people who who aren't "shocked shocked" by the fact that Junior was willing, possibly eager, to hear negative news about Candidate Clinton.

That said, we thought of Becker's slimy attack on Candidate Clinton when we read that highlighted passage, right there in paragraph 3. Junior "wasn't surprised or disturbed by the notion that [the approach] was part of a continuing effort by the Russian government to aid his father’s campaign?"

She stuck that in there right away. Here's our question:

Should Trump Junior have perceived the approach that way at that time?

We have no idea what Junior actually thought or actually knew at the time those emails arrived. But Becker was suggesting that he should have viewed the approach in the context of that "continuing effort" by the Russkies.

Is there any reason to think such a thing? Should that insinuation have been right there in paragraph 3, at the top of the Times' front page?

All in all, your journalists are frequently less than sharp and less than obsessively disciplined. As for Becker, she may have written the slimiest, sleaziest "news report" of the entire Trump-Clinton campaign.

Now, the Times has the "scary uranium" peddler shaping this new thrilling story. That strikes us as a bad deal.

We'd like to see an intelligent investigation of these matters. All over cable last night, we saw and heard excited partisans at work.

We woke to the scary uranium person. Are we the humans really capable of managing our affairs?

Next post: Toobin and Turley

9 comments:

  1. As indicated above, absent any new information indicating a crime the meeting is another nothingburger. Bad news for Anderson and Rachel because this casual and nonproductive meeting is peak Russia witch hunt and will be forgotten or dismissed as unimportant by any voter in two weeks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does a nothing burger come with freedom fries?

      Delete
  2. I agree with you, Anon, However, I fear that in two weeks, the Dems and the media will have cooked up another supposed scandal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Dems and the media will have discovered another scandal.

      FTFY

      Delete
    2. I fear that David in Cal has fallen on his head, and now (for the very first time at TDH) actually believes what he's writing.

      Delete
  3. Most people in responsible positions are saying he should have reported the conversation to the FBI. He didn't. That is why he is now in trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Partisan? Oh forfend. Who, on the right is going to join this "partisan" investigation of the racist conman, and admitted sexual predator?
    Sorry, Bob. That would mean they will have to put country over party. Not a fucking chance with all the plutocratic goodies within reach.
    But yeah. Both sides, if you're concern trolling for the right.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nothingburger ? Those are the words of either a devoted Trumpnik desperately spinning (ala Hannity) or someone driven insane back in 2000 (aka Bob). This revelation shows
    1) That DJT Jr. was lying about contacts with Russsia, and indeed even lied about the meeting daily till the NYT published it.
    2) That DJT, Kushner and Mantafort had a meeting with a Russian operative who promised them dirt on Hillary as part of their support for Trump. At the very least, it stinks to high heaven
    3) Shortly after this meeting, Trump Sr. asked the Russians to hack and release HRC mails.

    This may not be a legal case of collusion, but it gives much more strength to the obstruction of justice case. And it tells us that the First Family is a bunch of pathological, amoral liars.

    NothingBurger ? Dream on.

    ReplyDelete

  6. am so glad to share my testimony how Mallam Abudu help me conceive after several years of marriage i found it difficult to conceive and i thought is was over i will never conceive again after 6years of marriage my husband plane for divorce but with the glory of God i found a man who is bless my God with root and herbs who help me get pregnant i want to say a big thanks to him and to the world for the great help he rendered to me for making me a complete woman today now i am 8months pregnant hoping to have by own baby soon. Glory be to God.email Mallam Abudu and he will help you conceive via: mallamabuduspiritualhome@gmail.com can call him +2349055637784

    ReplyDelete