Plainly, Aristotle was wrong!

FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 2017

Us behaving like Them:
Do women get interrupted more than men in various corporate settings?

Apparently that's what the research says. Or so says the New York Times.

Yesterday, Susan Chira reported this topic for the Times, in the featured front-page report of the Business Day section. She pegged her report to the public outrage over the way Kamala Harris was interrupted while questioning Jeff Sessions this week.

In all honesty, Harris interrupted Sessions a fair amount during the course of her questioning. At one point, John McCain piped up. Here's the transcript of what happened:
MCCAIN (6/13/17): Mr. Chairman, the witness should be allowed to answer the question.

CHAIRMAN BURR: Senators will allow the chair to control the hearing.

Senator Harris, let him answer.

HARRIS (to Sessions): Pleased to. Thank you.
It seems to us that this sort of thing happens in congressional hearings quite often. Under the circumstances, it produced lots of pushback this week.

This brings us to Chira's report. Plainly, Aristotle was wrong, or so this would seem to suggest:
CHIRA (6/15/17): Senator Harris, a former prosecutor, assertively questioned Attorney General Jeff Sessions during his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, interrupted and chided her to let Mr. Sessions answer her questions. Soon after that, Senator Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina and the committee chairman, cut her off, saying her time had elapsed.
Chairman Burr "cut her off, saying her time had elapsed?" As people at the Times should know, there are ways to check such facts.

The PBS videotape of the hearing is here. Harris' questioning of Sessions starts at 2:06:48.

Burr tells Harris her time has elapsed at 2:13:31. At the time when Burr "cut her off," her allotted five minutes of questioning time had run almost seven minutes.

That said, Harris asked very good questions. The ridiculous question came from Ron Wyden, who somewhat excitedly asked Sessions this:
WYDEN: Last Thursday, I asked former Director Comey about the FBI's interactions with you, General Sessions, prior to your stepping aside from the Russian investigation.

Mr. Comey said that your continued engagement with the Russian investigation was, quote, "problematic," and he, Mr. Comey, could not discuss it in public.
Mr. Comey also said that FBI personnel had been calling for you to step aside from the investigation at least two weeks before you finally did so.

Now, in your prepared statement, you stated you received only, quote, "limited information necessary to inform your recusal decision." But, given Director Comey's statement, we need to know what that was.

Were you aware of any concerns at the FBI, or elsewhere in government, about your contacts with the Russians or any other matters relevant to whether you should step aside from the Russian investigation?

[...]

WYDEN: General Sessions, respectfully, you're not answering the question.

SESSIONS: Well, what is the question?

WYDEN: The question is, Mr. Comey said that there were matters with respect to the recusal that were problematic and he couldn't talk about them. What are they?
For the record, Comey did not say "that FBI personnel had been calling for [Sessions] to step aside from the investigation at least two weeks before [he] finally did." At any rate, Wyden wanted Sessions to explain whatever it was that Comey had refused to discuss.

How was Sessions supposed to do that? Wyden's semi-hysterical questioning made little apparent sense.

Sessions was right when he went on to say that Comey had been engaging in innuendo. The problem is, under rules of the game, you aren't allowed to say such things about Comey the God, who seems to be rather slippery.

The Comey/Sessions hearings have been analyzed very poorly. When a chase of this intensity takes place, all logic goes out the window. Consider one last example of what can occur when a great chase is on:

We refer you to Virginia Heffernan's unique confession at Slate. Our eyes were drawn to the headline on her podcast. The headline in question said this:
"The Testimony of Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III"
Interesting! We wondered how honest Heffernan would be about her region/race-baiting.

For better or worse, we'll give her credit for being extremely honest! In a classic case of Us behaving like Them, her discussion started like this:
HEFFERNAN (6/15/17): Today, we're talking about Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. I want to hit that middle name the way my co-host Jamelle Bouie does because "Beauregard" is kind of the answer to "Hussein," and to those who used to hit Barack Obama's middle name hard, with the same kind of innuendo.
For the record, she did hit that middle name hard.

We give Heffernan credit for honesty. She admitted that she was toying with innuendo, the same way The Others have done.

Heffernan is certainly right about the past focus on Obama's middle name. She now admitted that she wanted to play the same game, in which a person's name is used to mark him as alien, as The Other. When people like Heffernan pimp Sessions' name, they are telling us that he's the racial/regional Other.

It was a classic example of Us behaving like Them. People like Heffernan fail in these ways when a major chase is on and we're trying to lock them all up.

Your lizard will swear that Heffernan's conduct was right, even right on. As always, your lizard is wrong.

Aristotle was all wet too. He called us "the rational animal!"

8 comments:

  1. reading your article about Plainly, Aristotle was wrong!its interesting and informative for all children for more click here JAN CARTOON

    ReplyDelete
  2. Somersby staring off into the distance, talking about everything but what happened. McCain has no authority to interrupt another Senator. That he did so and did not lose his place at that hearing was outrageous. No amount of rambling on about Ron Wyden changes that.
    Bob Gardner
    Randolph, MA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for noting this.

      The reason why a Senator interrupts the person testifying is because those testifying have a strategy of burning up the Senator's allotted time by discussing non-pertinent things that are not responsive to the question asked. This strategy is explicit and is used with Democrats. Sessions was doing this to Harris and she tried to prevent it by interrupting him to refocus him on the topic at hand, the question that was asked, when he demonstrably wandered off topic.

      Funny Somerby didn't mention that.

      And yes, women do get interrupted more often than men do. Within the male sex, high status men interrupt those with lower status more often. Men and women talk about the same amount of time -- it is a myth that women talk more than men.

      I experienced this first hand during my first week at IBM Research Division. I was at a meeting in which people were brainstorming ideas, facilitated by a moderator. I spoke several times and contributed a couple of ideas. Later, the moderator summed up by writing the ideas on the white board. None of the things I had said were listed. He then asked if he had left anything out. I raised my hand and said that all of my contributions had been left out. He asked what they were and I summarized them, at which point he wrote them. But I had to appear like Ms. B*tch in order to be included and it was made very clear that he not only didn't value what I had said, but didn't remember any of it. That is what women experience on a daily basis in the workplace. And if you correct the record or push back or complain, you are considered "difficult" and are marginalized. So you are damned if you speak up and damned if you don't.

      So, Mr. Somerby, this is more than a rhetorical device to 50% of the population, including Senator Harris. That Somerby couldn't even figure out what the interruptions consisted of is very telling.

      Delete
  3. Hi,
    I really appreciate your inputs on my situation Dr happy and what could I do with-out you. Thank you in advance.
    I was in a relationship with this guy for the past 1 and a half year.. We became close real fast and were very serious about each other… he’s German and was in the country for her internship.. he left after first 6 months and came back after a couple of months.. he said that he had come down for me.. WE started living – in.. We discussed faMILY, KIDS, future, moving to EU together.. everything was going good until of last August when I started to get jealous about his moves, I got controlling and things started to get worse.. we spoke about it a lot of times where he expressed how he felt but I was not able to understand why I was doing that.. During our discussion I would always say I did .. This February he called it off and since then I have been a mess.. I gave it a lot of thought and realised my mistakes and why I was doing it.. I tried talking to him .. begged him.. pleaded him .. but he says that he has lost all his feelings for me and would never get back to me..I was in my knees praying looking for help, them i fine a comment online how a spell caster help to restored relationship get ex lover back, ” so i decided to give a try coz i love my boyfriend so much. so i contacted Dr happy http://happyspelltemple.webs.com/ tell him all my problem and he gave me 100%guarantee that i will have my boyfriend back after the spell so i was gifted and lucky to have contacted him i did every thing he ask of me and to my greatest surprise a day after the spell my boyfriend call me and apology for what he did to me and ask for my forgiveness to come back again for me, we both are happily living together again plz Contact him urgently via.........
    happylovespell2@gmail.com
    or add him on whats-app +2348133873774
    Junia Noel from USA

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why were Bernie and Rand Paul the only two senators to vote against sanctions on Russia? Why won't Bernie release his taxes?

    ReplyDelete
  5. From Digby today:

    "Jane Mayer notices, as have others, that people like Hodgkinson often have a history of domestic violence. Rebecca Traister made the connection last year:
    Recent research done by Everytown for Gun Safety has found that of the mass shootings in the United States between 2009 and 2015, 57 percent included victims who were a family member, spouse, or former spouse of the shooter. Sixteen percent of attackers had been previously charged with domestic violence. A recent piece in the New York Times suggested that the impulse toward domestic, gendered violence may be the thing that draws a few terrorists toward the Islamic State, since ISIS’s practices include sexual slavery and a fidelity to traditional gender norms as recruiting tools for young men.
    "Obviously, not everyone accused of domestic violence becomes a mass shooter," Mayer writes. "But it’s clear that an alarming number of those who have been accused of domestic abuse pose serious and often a lethal threats, not just to their intimate partners but to society at large."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Help on How to Get Your Ex wife/husband Back..
    My wife and I have been married for 7 years on November 11th. She recently told me she wasn't in love with me that she loved me more like a friend. She said she wants a divorce that she has been unhappy for a year now. I've been not so good as far as making promises and not keeping them but I have been trying to change and it doesn't seem to work. I love my wife to death and I took my vowels very seriously. I asked her to go to marriage counciling and she said no.we have 4 kids. We agreed to a 2 month break and try to work things out after that. Some of the problems we face are not having our own place to live and may be debt pile up. I really want things to work. The hurt that I feel is killing me and I’m to the point where I don’t eat and rarely drink anything.one day i was online and there was one particular testimony I saw, it was about a woman called Silvia Soulez ,she testified about how Dr .Goodluck brought back her Ex lover in less than 17 hours and at the end of her testimony she drop Dr .Goodluck e-mail address. After reading all these,I decided to give Dr .Goodluck a try. I contacted him via email and explained my problems to him. In just the space of 17hours, my wife came back to me. We solved our issues, and we are even happier than before. Dr .Goodluck is really a talented and gifted man and i will not stop publishing him because he is a wonderful man…If you have a problem and you are looking for a real and genuine spell caster to solve that problem for you. Try the great Dr .Goodluck today, he will be the answer to your problems. Here’s his contact:
    Email him at: goodluck05spellcaster@gmail.com ,
    Call him or add him on whats-app: +2348138654465
    Or on His website: http://goodluck05spellcaster.yolasite.com
    Tom Irwin, Manchester, United Kingdom

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello
    I'm Marie Scott I'm from united states, i am married with two kids. Life has been a miserable for me and my kids for over six years when my husband dumped me for his new mistress due to some minor misunderstanding that we had. So he engage in a fight with me and throw me out of the house, so all through these sorrowful period of my life, i have been in pain. So one day, as i was browsing through the internet, i came across many post about spell casters testifying how they were helped by them so i decided to seek help and advice. but naturally i didn't believe in spells or magic powers but due to the fact that i was deeply in love with my husband, i decided to go for a try, So i came in contact with Dr.iyaryi of driayaryi2012@hotmail.com but before i contact Dr.iyaryi, i was scammed by a lot of spell casters who makes me believe that they can help me. So because of all these, i almost lost hope that i can't get my husband back anymore so when i contacted this Dr.iyaryi, he assure me that he will help me to reunite my marriage, so without demanding any single cent from me, he did a spell for me and he advice me to wait for my husband to come back to me in 3 days. I actually waited as he said, after the spell was done on the third day my husband actually called me on my mobile phone and started apologizing for everything that he had caused me and the kids. This was how my marriage was reunited again and Starting from this point till date, i and my husband has been living peacefully and happily. Anybody viewing this testimony should please stop by and read and if you are so interested in contacting Dr. iyaryi for any help, simply do that via his email id (driayaryi2012@hotmail.com) and remain happy. And also Reach him on WhatsApp Number: +2349057915709 Thanks Dr. IyaryI

    ReplyDelete