The Washington Post succumbs to fear!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 31, 2012

Won’t tell the truth about Ryan: The New York Times did the right thing this morning, even though its execution was flawed.

Quite correctly, the Times did a stand-alone news report about the string of groaners in Paul Ryan’s convention address. In our hard-copy Times, the stand-alone report bore this perfectly accurate headline:

“Facts Took a Beating In Ryan’s Speech”

The Times deserves a lot of credit for taking this approach—and for writing that accurate headline. By way of contrast, consider what the Washington Post did in this morning’s paper.

The paper includes a Gene Robinson column, “Paul Ryan, Whopper King.” It includes Melinda Henneberger’s opinion column, “We are all fact checkers now, of necessity.”

(Henneberger offers this assessment of Ryan’s address: “As I listened to Paul Ryan, tweeting as I went, I couldn't remember ever hearing an acceptance speech so rich in untrue un-facts.” Our reaction exactly.)

The paper includes a Fact-Checker column on Ryan's address, although that’s a fairly standard presentation in the Washington Post.

If you bought today’s Washington Post, you would have seen two columns about Ryan’s misstatements, along with the Fact-Checker feature. You would not have seen a news report telling you that, as a matter of fact, Ryan said a bunch of things which just weren’t especially true.

The New York Times correctly judged that the degree of dissembling in Ryan’s speech rated a stand-alone report. We agree with that judgment.

The Washington Post reached a different judgment. In place of a news report about Ryan’s misstatements, the Post presented a front-page news report about the fact-checking of Ryan’s speech.

Are you following us here? The Post didn’t do a report about Ryan’s misstatements. Instead, the Post did a report about the people reporting Ryan’s misstatements!

The Post decided to cover the coverage instead of the whoppers themselves.

The Post might be right in its judgment, of course. Or the Washington Post may have succumbed to wet palms and cold clammy fear.

They found it so easy to lie about Gore! And they find it so hard to tell the truth about bold honest truthful Paul Ryan.

20 comments:

  1. I assume (hope) we'll have a review of this New York Times article soon:

    How MSNBC Became Fox’s Liberal Evil Twin
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/31/us/politics/msnbc-as-foxs-liberal-evil-twin.html?_r=3&ref=media

    MSNBC has pumped up its ratings by recasting itself as a left-leaning riposte to Fox News, and that’s fine. Fox long ago proved that a lot of viewers like to hear cable anchors echo what they already think; MSNBC is just playing catch-up. Fox is still well ahead, especially during a Republican convention, but on Tuesday, there were times when MSNBC drew significantly more convention viewers than CNN.

    That’s because MSNBC offers counterprogramming, not coverage. All that arch sarcasm and partisan brio may rev up the cable channel’s fans, but it constrains — and stains — NBC News, its corporate sibling, which is still the country’s No. 1 source in the evening.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. no.

      *in our adverserial political system*, both parties (and individual pols as well) legitimately have, or should have, their own propagandists in the non-pejorative sense of that word, i.e. a friendly interpretation of their words, deeds and positions. they should and do employ them directly, but they should also try to see to it that on balance they are fairly represented within the various mediums as well.

      the basic premise of the article you cite (and your comment) that the non-fox media, the networks and cnn, are the good people is not true. because of fear and greed, they allow falsehoods to pass without adequate scrutiny, giving the public a massively distorted picture of reality.

      who does this most benefit? the pols and party who tells the most and biggest lies, the gop -- by a large margin. . . . the dem party cant force the mainstream to do legitimate journalisism. if it wasnt for msnbc, the situation would much more egregious than it is.

      you and alessandra stanley say that both fox and msnbc are *similar*. superficially to an extent, but they are not anywhere near being the *same* substantively. the difference is in the parties they advocate for. . . . to contrast them as though they each were defense attorneys -- msnbc is the pro bono public defender handling the occasional non-violent misdemeanor case while fox is consigliere to an organized crime family -- whose chief target is msnbcs dem clients.

      Delete
  2. The raison d'etre of FOX was to counter the liberal bias of the MSM.
    Conversely, the raison d'etre of MSNBC is to counter the deceptions spouted by FOX.

    My wife watches Brian Williams regularly.

    Williams rarely expresses an opinion. He tries to preserve the cachet of ye olde tyme news anchor.

    Unfortunately, he leaves much to be desired when he interviews a seasoned deceiver.

    Last night, in a brief Q & A with Paul Ryan, Williams simply did not follow up Ryan's misleading claims; claims any first-year stringer from BBC would have pounced on like a fox terrier on a rat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice weblog here! Additionally your website so much up very fast!
    What web host are you the usage of? Can I am getting
    your associate link in your host? I desire my website loaded up as fast as yours lol
    My weblog - research

    ReplyDelete
  4. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is valuable and everything. However think of if you added
    some great images or videos to give your posts more, "pop"!
    Your content is excellent but with pics and clips, this blog could certainly be one of the very
    best in its field. Terrific blog!
    My blog post : how make money internet

    ReplyDelete
  5. Spot on with this write-up, I really believe that this website needs a great deal more attention.

    I'll probably be back again to read through more, thanks for the advice!
    Visit my page affiliate marketing guide

    ReplyDelete
  6. WOW just what I was looking for. Came here by searching for complaisant
    Also visit my web page legit online payday loans

    ReplyDelete
  7. Have you ever thought about writing an ebook or guest authoring on
    other blogs? I have a blog based upon on the same information you discuss and would really like to have
    you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would enjoy your work.
    If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send
    me an email.
    Feel free to visit my webpage stock market investing online

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am really thankful to the owner of this web site who has
    shared this wonderful article at at this place.
    Also visit my web blog :: top penny stocks

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello would you mind stating which blog platform you're working with? I'm looking to start my own blog in the near future but I'm having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I'm looking for something completely
    unique. P.S Sorry for being off-topic but I had to ask!
    Here is my weblog - cypress semiconductor corporation buy stocks

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all of us you really recognise what you are talking approximately!

    Bookmarked. Kindly also consult with my website =).

    We will have a link trade agreement among us
    Here is my web site ... online trading comparison

    ReplyDelete
  11. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this
    topic to be really something that I think I would
    never understand. It seems too complicated and extremely broad for
    me. I'm looking forward for your next post, I'll try to
    get the hang of it!
    Feel free to visit my weblog affiliates

    ReplyDelete
  12. What's up, this weekend is pleasant in support of me, since this time i am reading this enormous informative piece of writing here at my house.

    Feel free to visit my website; legitimate work from home

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wonderful blog! Do you have any suggestions for
    aspiring writers? I'm hoping to start my own blog soon but I'm a little lost on everything.
    Would you advise starting with a free platform like Wordpress or go for a paid option?

    There are so many options out there that I'm completely confused .. Any tips? Many thanks!

    Also visit my web page: video

    ReplyDelete
  14. Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be
    on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while
    people think about worries that they plainly don't know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

    my web site: how to make money online

    ReplyDelete
  15. I've been surfing online greater than three hours lately, but I by no means discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours. It's
    lovely ρricе suffіcient fοr me.
    Persοnally, if аll webmaѕters and bloggerѕ made gоοd сontеnt matегіal as yοu probably
    dіԁ, the ωeb will likely bе much more helрful thаn еνег beforе.


    Mу blοg рost raspberry ketone uk

    ReplyDelete